Thus, they probably witnessed an ambiguous event and filled in the missing information with details that were prescribed by their own stereotypes of slum kids.
Before any formal discussion, they cast a vote. Juror 3 was also mean. Furthermore, the old loud mouthed bigot stubbornly advocated a guilty verdict just because the young boy was from a slum and hence his reasoning that all slum kids are inherently rotten; a classic case of stereotyping whereby judgments are made about the person just because he belongs to a particular group.
Group Behavior It is interesting to note that the five stages of Group Development Model can be quite clearly captured in this film. At the beginning of the play, eleven of the jurors believe that the boy killed his father.
This was less of a superficial change. Ask yourself what filter of assumptions and biases you apply to their messages.
Juror 8 was a very important juror, he was the protagonist. Juror 3 was the antagonist. The application of the following three areas of organizational behavior helps us to give an academic bent to the film and helps us appreciate the true genius behind a drama film.
We will start off by exploring the phenomenon of Perception and Individual Decision Making where we would be exploring the decision making process at an individual level, explaining the underlying theories and biases involved in individual decision making and try to map those to specific instances in the film.
He was a slum kid himself, so he probably had some doubts, but went along with the majority initially because of pressure. This strongly suggests that there was strong pressure to conform to the majority. Groupshiftoccurs when discussing a given set of alternatives and arriving at a solution, group members tend to exaggerate the initial positions that they hold.
Remember that Joseph Sweeney the old mandid not accuse either of the eye witnesses of lying. On the whole, I think that the film was able to illustrate few of the central issues we have learnt so far, and effectively pointed out the flaws and minor problems it can tend to have.
The origin of this war was just differing ideas. Cobb the angry guy: He has no arguments in favour or against the teenager.
Throughout the film, he always remained consistent in his opposition to the majority which essentially made other question their judgment. The initial vote that was taken was public.
This makes people think more deeply about the issue. Similarly, the juror in this movie relied on his sense of sight to form a judgment — a rather strong one — that the boy should be sent to the electric chair. Although his prejudice is eventually appropriately dealt with, it is crucial to note the role of perception in his verdict.
He failed to remember the names of the films. In my opinion, this is what occurred in the film as well. For example, the old man changed his vote simply because he felt that if someone is defending his vote with such conviction, then he may have some important points to make.
Since all but one of the jurors had an expectation of a guiltyverdict, they all confirmed their biases by continuously reiterating those same twisted facts that confirmed their expectations and nobody but one stopped to question.
In addition, Juror 8 was also fair. One of the jurors is timid in nature and hence his opinions are not heard and ignored.Oct 15, · As I watched it, I thought about how true and how shallow the PR maxim “Perception equals reality” is.
The story line is about 12 men serving on a jury who have to decide whether to find an year-old defendant guilty of murdering his father. MHR 12 angry men portion final exam study guide by Janae_Morales includes 20 questions covering vocabulary, terms and more. Quizlet flashcards, activities.
Obviously, there are multiple ways of knowing and areas of knowledge that have been presented during the Grade 11 year, but in order to most suitably answer this question, just few of both AOK and WOK will be identified, explained, after which a relationship to "12 Angry Men" will be created.
12 Angry men notes & discussion. 1.
What kinds of attributions were used by the jurors and how did these attributions affect their initial judgment of the boy? Another type of attributional process that could be seen in 12 angry men was Kelley’s principle of augmenting.
For example one of the jurors argued that if the boy went back to. The innocent and the beautiful have no enemy but Time” – William Butler Yeats The movie “Twelve Angry Men” opens up with a sequence which justifies the above stated quote.
4. Mine is better thinking: One of the jurors thinks that since he is an influential person in his domain, he knows better because of his higher status in society. Selective Perception: One of the jurors is only interested in finishing the verdict.
He has no arguments in favour or against the teenager. 6.Download